Controlling the Performance of a Thermionic tube

ABSTRACT

Controlling the performance of the thermionic tube ( 102 ) having a cathode ( 103 ), a plate ( 104 ) and a grid ( 105 ) is disclosed. The tube is configured to provide amplification of an audio derived signal ( 106 ) and is arranged to apply a grid bias voltage to the grid. The absence of an input audio signal is detected whereafter output current between cathode and plate is measured to identify actual output current. The actual output current is compared against a preferred output current and the grid bias voltage is adjusted so as to bring the actual output current value towards the preferred output current value.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority from United Kingdom Patent ApplicationNo. 0814382.8, filed Aug. 6, 2008, the whole contents of which areincorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a method of controlling the performanceof a thermionic tube having a cathode, a plate and a grid. The presentinvention also relates to an apparatus for controlling the performanceof a thermionic tube when amplifying an audio signal and to an audiosignal amplifier.

2. Description of the Related Art

Despite advances in solid state technology for the amplification ofaudio signals, specialist markets continue to exist for the deploymentof thermionic devices, in which amplification is achieved by controllingthe flow of electrons in an evacuated tube. Such devices are usuallyreferred to as thermionic tubes or thermionic valves which will bereferred to herein as thermionic tubes.

Thermionic tubes continue to be used in high quality audio amplifiers inwhich to obtain optimum performance, a triode thermionic tube may bearranged to operate in a class A configuration, in which a bias signalis applied such that a single valve may be responsive to both thepositive and negative half cycles of an incoming audio signal. Anoptimum level of bias may be selected during the manufacture of theamplifier and again this bias signal may be adjusted periodically.However, it is known that thermionic tubes degrade through operationtherefore after a period of use, although being perfectly functional,degradation may have occurred such that a previous optimum bias levelmay have become less than optimum for the current operationalcharacteristics of the tube. Thus, in order to maintain optimumperformance, it would be preferable for the bias level to be adjusted ona regular basis throughout the lifetime of the tube. However, currently,such an approach would be unrealistic except for very high qualityprofessional applications.

It is also known for thermionic tubes to be used in amplificationsystems for musical instruments and in particular for electric guitars,including electric base guitars. Some amplifiers of this type operate inclass A mode but the majority operate in class B, in which one tubehandles the positive half cycle and a co-operating tube deals with thenegative half cycle of the input audio signal. To improve linearity itis also known to operate in class NB mode, thereby obtaining acompromise between the linearity of class A and the power savingcharacteristics of class B.

It has become standard practice in guitar amplifiers for the tubes to beoverdriven well beyond there recommended operating conditions, in whichthe resulting distortion is embraced as enhancing the overall musicaleffect; the amplification system effectively becoming part of theinstrument. A consequence of driving thermionic tubes to their limits inguitar amplifiers is that the tubes themselves rapidly become degradedand when not actually being played it would be desirable for measures tobe taken to ensure that the tubes are not unnecessary forced to workwhen an output signal is not required. However, presently, except forplacing a guitar amplifier in a standby condition, which usually removesthe high tension (HT) supply to the tubes, no systems exist formonitoring the performance of the tubes and adapting a workingenvironment, so as to enhance their performance characteristics while atthe same time limiting unnecessary damage.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided amethod of controlling the performance of a thermionic tube having acathode, a plate (or anode) and a grid that is configured to provideamplification of an audio derived signal, including the application of agrid bias voltage to the grid. The method comprises the steps ofdetecting the absence of an input audio signal and, in the absence of aninput audio signal, measuring output current between a cathode and aplate of the tube to identify an actual output current value, comparingsaid actual output current value against a preferred output currentvalue and adjusting a grid bias voltage so as to bring said actualoutput current value towards said preferred output current value.

Thus, in this way, the performance of the tube may be monitoredcontinually during periods when no audio signal is present so as toobtain an optimum level of current flow by adjusting the bias voltage.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a device for controlling the performance of the thermionictube;

FIG. 2 details the control device identified in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 details the input circuit identified in FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 details the output circuit identified in FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 shows procedures implemented within the processing deviceidentified in FIG. 2;

FIG. 6 details pre-operational activities identified in FIG. 5;

FIG. 7 details operational activities identified in FIG. 5;

FIG. 8 details procedures for biasing a tube, identified in FIG. 7;

FIG. 9 details procedures for measuring cathode current, identified inFIG. 8;

FIG. 10 details procedures for adjusting grid bias, identified in FIG.8;

FIG. 11 shows a control device in the form of a module attached to acircuit board; and

FIG. 12 shows the control device housed in an acrylic tube forapplication in guitar amplifiers.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FIG. 1

A device 101 for controlling the performance of a thermionic tube orvalve 102 when amplifying an audio signal is shown in FIG. 1. Thethermionic tube 102 has a cathode 103 a plate (or anode) 104 and a grid105 for receiving a grid bias voltage 101 and an audio input signal 106.

The tube is also provided with a heating device, as is well known in theart, that heats the cathode 103 to make electrons available that areattracted to the high positive voltage applied to the plate.

The grid 105 placed in the electron flow close to the cathode forcessome electrons back to the cathode when the bias voltage is applied.Thus it is possible to control current flow for a given voltage bymaking the grid more or less negative. With the grid made very negativethe tube is completely turned off and with no bias applied to the grid,the tube becomes fully turned on.

The application of audio signal 106 to a control grid modulates the flowof electrons but if a signal goes positive, it is not possible to makemore electrons flow. Thus it is necessary to apply a bias which makesthe grid negative by say 10 volts. Thus, the tube is deliberatelythrottled back so that it is now possible to apply an alternating signalranging between minus 5 volts and plus 5 volts.

As is known in the art, a resistor is placed in series with the anodesuch that the current flow will produce a varying voltage at the anodemuch bigger than that applied to the control grid. Thus, an input signalvarying between minus 5 volts and plus 5 volts may amplify to minus 100volts and plus 100 volts which in turn represents the gain of the valve.

Triode valves of the type illustrated in FIG. 1 are considered to givethe least amount of audio distortion but compared to otherconfigurations there gain is relatively low. Thus, as is known in theart, in some applications tetrode valves or pentode valves may bedeployed in order to mitigate the effect of Miller capacitance.

In order to power a loudspeaker, an additional power tube used forhigh-power but having a relatively lower voltage gain. A stereoamplifier may typically include four tubes, with two tubes beingdeployed for each stereo channel.

Tubes have a high impedance so it is necessary to provide a transformerwithin the amplifier, in the anode circuit, allowing a loudspeaker to bematched to the amplification circuit.

It is also known, particularly in guitar amplifiers, to use tubes in apush-pull configuration also referred to as class B operation. Onetransformer is used with a centre tap and an earlier stage splits anincoming audio signal into two half cycles by means of a phase splitter.Thus, each tube amplifies half of the signal with typically two tubesbeing provided for the amplification of each phase. Thus, a guitaramplifier may typically include four tubes (with more if a higher poweroutput is required) but arranged in a different configuration to that ofa typical stereo amplifier.

Class B operation allows the tubes to cool down and in practice thisconfiguration may operate at higher power levels. The two portions ofthe output signal are then combined by means of an impedance matchingtransformer. However, a problem may exist with this configuration inthat if the tubes become unmatched, a degree of distortion will beintroduced.

It is known that tubes start to degrade after a relatively short periodof time, particularly when compared to solid state devices.Manufacturers produce tubes in matched pairs and even in quartets oroctets for high-power amplifiers but this process increases the overallcost of the tubes significantly. Furthermore, after typically 100 hoursof use they will tend to degrade by differing amounts and will thereforeno longer be matched. Consequently, in order to maintain optimumperformance it is known for the tubes to be replaced at regularintervals. It is also known for tubes to be rebiased but again thisrequires manual intervention on the part of a skilled technician.

Although it is known to control bias, it is typical for the same biassignal to be supplied to all of the tubes, thus the bias level may beadjusted but only once. Consequently, such an approach does not provideany compensation for tubes degrading by differing extents.

As the tube ages, it is known to reduce bias because as the tube getsolder, electron emission from the cathode 103 diminishes. However, ifthe bias is reduced too much, this may result in too much currentflowing through the tube which, although not immediately apparent to theuser, will result in the tube operating outside its optimum range andwill result in further degradation.

The control device 101 of a preferred embodiment seeks to identify apreferred current flow and then maintain this for the operational lifeof each tube. Thus, any tube 102 controlled by the control device 101would be biased to obtain these optimised conditions and with aplurality of tubes provided within an amplifier, each tube isindividually biased.

In the embodiment of FIG. 1, a low value resistor 106 of typically oneohm is introduced into the cathode circuit and a voltage is tapped offwhich is dependent upon the current passing through the tube. Thisvoltage is supplied to the control device 101 so that the control deviceis in a position to determine the level of the actual current flowingthrough each tube 102. A grid bias voltage is then generated to providea voltage to each individual grid which is in turn the voltage requiredto maintain the current at a constant optimum level. Thus, the controldevice 101 is configured to ensure that whenever possible, the tube 102is operating at a preferred level of current when no audio signal 107 ispresent.

With tubes operating in the class B push-pull mode, it is possible toimprove the balance between co-operating tubes so as to minimise thepresence of standing DC current in the output transformer. Thisminimises heat dissipation within the transformer and also reduces audiodistortion.

Lines 107 and 108 for measuring cathode current (by measuring thevoltage drop across resistor 106) supply DC levels to the control device101 and they also supply an alternating signal when an audio signal 106is present. It is possible for such a signal to be detected which inturn provides an indication to the control device 101 that an audiosignal is present. This is desirable because the control device isconfigured to make adjustments when no audio signal is present and forthe adjustment routines to be inhibited when an audio signal isdetected. However processing and balancing operations performed by thecontrol device only require relatively short periods of no audio signalbeing present therefore it is possible for the controlling operations tobe effected even between audio tracks in the hi-fi amplifierimplementation.

FIG. 2

Control device 101 is detailed in FIG. 2. The control device 101includes a programmable microprocessor/micro controller for processingdigital signals in response to program control. In a preferredembodiment, the processing device 201 may be implemented as a PIC(peripheral interface controller) processor, being provided with aplurality of input ports, a plurality of output ports and internalnon-volatile storage. Thus, data may be stored within the processingdevice by the provision of electrically erasable programmable read onlymemory (E2PROM).

In preferred embodiments, the control EEPROM device 101 is implementedas a module which may be included in an amplifier design (detailed inFIG. 11) or retrofitted to existing amplifier systems, as detailed inFIG. 12. A preferred module is capable of controlling four thermionictube devices, although the procedures performed for each of these tubesare entirely independent and therefore the number of tubes controlledmay vary significantly. However, many amplifier designs do include fourtubes and for amplifiers containing more than four tubes an appropriatenumber of control devices may be provided. Again, each of these devicesacts independently and there is no requirement to provide a master/slaveconfiguration for example, in the preferred embodiment.

Input voltages, representing cathode currents, for each of the fourtubes present within the amplifier design are supplied to respectiveinputs 202, 203, 204 and 205. Each input is supplied to an input of theprocessing device 201 via a respective amplifying and buffering circuit206, 207, 208 and 209. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, analog signalsare supplied to the processing device 201 and analog to digitalconversion is performed under program control.

Input circuit 206 also supplies its respective input signal to an audiofrequency detection circuit 210. Thus, when the circuit 210 detects thepresence of an audio signal a disabling signal is supplied to theprocessing device 201 which disables performance control, possibly bythe implementation of an interrupt routine. Input circuit 207 isdetailed in FIG. 3.

Output lines 212, 213, 214 and 215 provide control voltages to eachrespective tube being controlled. Output ports from the processingdevice 201 supply digital control signals to output circuits 216, 217,218 and 219 and digital to analog conversion devices are provided withinthe output circuits in order to maintain stability and reduce noise.Output circuit 217 is detailed in FIG. 4.

FIG. 3

Input circuit 207 is shown in FIG. 3, connected to a cathode currentmeasuring resistor 106. In a preferred embodiment, one volt appearsacross resistor 106 for each amp that is conducted. Preferably, thecontrol device 101 is configured to measure cathode currents up to 250mA.

A non-inverting amplifier 301 produces a gain of 20 in the preferredembodiment thus a maximum cathode current will produce an output voltageon output line 302 of 5V. This is supplied to a ten bit analog todigital converter that forms part of the processing device 201. Thus,for the available voltage range of 0 to 5V, internal numbers areproduced over a one thousand and twenty-four level range.

Current flow to the non-inverting amplifier 301 is controlled via aninput resistor 303 and a protection diode 304 protects the processingdevice 202 should a very high cathode current be present. Thenon-inverting amplifier 301 (an operational amplifier) has a high inputimpedance so it does not play any part in terms of the loading of thesignal.

Input circuit 206 also provides an AC coupled input to detection device210. A capacitor within circuit 210 isolates the AC signal from the DClevel and feeds this to an analog to digital converter within theprocessing device 201. If there is no AC signal present, 2.5 volts willappear across a potential divider and a steady DC level will be presenton the input. However, if any alternating current is present, avariation in the signal is produced. Processing device 201 stores theinput value produced by detector 210 and compares this upon eachexecution loop. If consecutive measured levels are different, theprocessing device 201 assumes that an audio signal is present and biascontrol is inhibited.

FIG. 4

Output circuit 217 is detailed in FIG. 4. A digital output from theprocessing device 201 is supplied to a digital to analog converter 401which in turn producers an analog voltage that is supplied to anon-inverting buffering amplifier 402. An output from bufferingamplifier 402 is supplied to output line 213 via a (PNP) bipolartransistor 403.

FIG. 5

Procedures implemented within the processing device 201 are shown inFIG. 5. Under these procedures, the processing device 201 implements amethod of controlling the performance of a thermionic tube having acathode 103, a plate 104 and a grid 105 that is configured to provideamplification of an audio derived signal and includes the application ofa grid bias voltage to the grid 105.

Circuit 210 is provided to detect the absence of an input audio signaland in the absence of this audio signal, output current is measuredbetween cathode 103 and plate 104 to identify an actual output currentvalue, preferably determined by measuring the voltage drop across seriesresistor 106. The control device 101 compares the actual output currentvalue against a preferred output value and adjusts the grid bias voltageso as to bring the actual output, current value towards the preferredoutput current value.

In step 501 the processing device 201 performs pre-operationalactivities that include initiating the processing device to set upoperating conditions that includes initiating registers, inputs andoutputs. It also resets all flags and enables interrupts. Thesepre-operational activities are detailed in FIG. 6.

In step 502 a question is asked as to whether a fault condition has beenidentified. A fault condition exists when the cathode current flow isextremely high (beyond normal operation) and such a condition will havebeen identified when the amplifier was previously used. Thus, thecontrol device 101 stores the fault condition in non-volatile memorysuch that on returning power to the amplifier after a period of non-use,the fault condition will remain and further damage to the amplifier isavoided. The detection of theses fault conditions is detailed in FIG. 8.

Having detected a fault condition at step 502, a response is made to thefault. In a first embodiment, this response may effectively involveshutting down the amplifier and raising an alert to the effect thattechnical intervention is required. However, in a more sophisticatedembodiment, it is possible for the amplification tubes to be provided inbanks such that a plurality of tubes are operating in parallel for eachside of the positive or negative halve cycle. Thus, under thesessituations, a single faulty tube could be identified and disconnectedfrom its HT supply, possibly using field effect transistors.Furthermore, when operating in the class B push-pull configuration, ifone tube is disabled in this way, its partner on the co-operating halvecycle is also disabled so as to maintain balance within the amplifieritself. In a further enhanced embodiment, it would also be possible toapply additional drive to the remaining tubes thereby compensating forthe overall loss of power. Furthermore, a user would be alerted to themodified form of operation allowing the user (possibly a stageguitarist) to make repairs at a later date while being able to maintaina performance.

If the question asked at step 502 is answered in the negative, to theeffect that a fault does not exist, a question is asked at step 504 asto whether the amplifier has been placed in a standby condition. Someamplifiers, such as guitar amplifiers, provide a switch allowing a userto select a standby condition which in turn removes the HT supply fromthe tubes. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, the standby condition isidentified by the cathode current being very low, as detailed in FIG. 8.Thus, on detecting a standby condition by a standby flag being set, thecontrol device 101 is placed in a similar condition so as to avoidinappropriate bias control. If the question asked at step 504 isanswered with a negative to the effect that the amplifier is not in astandby condition (and having previously identified the amplifier as notbeing in a fault condition), operational activities are initiated atsteps 506.

FIG. 6

Pre-operational activities 501 are detailed in FIG. 6. At step 601 theprocessing device 201 is initialised and initial conditions are set.

Digital to analog converters 401 are initially set to zero so as to givea maximum negative grid bias to all of the tubes. Thus, initially, allof the tubes are heavily turned off. The grid bias is forced to amaximum negative voltage with respect to the cathode, with the cathodebeing at ground potential. In a preferred embodiment, the grid is drivento minus 50 volts, thereby making it substantially more negative thanthe cathode and prohibiting the conduction of any current through thetube.

At step 602 the tubes are allowed to warm-up. Registers are incrementedby unity each half second followed by a statement to the effect that ifgreater than variable “warm-up” then set warm-up flag. After warm-up,the warm-up flag is cleared and the warm-up procedure is not performedagain. In this way, the valves are allowed to warm-up, the HT supply isthen applied and the grid bias voltage is ramped up from its heavily offposition to an operational condition.

At step 603 gain is measured for each of the tubes within the amplifier.In a preferred embodiment, when a new tube has been inserted within theamplifier, the new value of gain (that is to say the transconductancecalculated by dividing outward current by input voltage) is written tostorage. Each time the amplifier is switched on, the present gain iscompared against the stored value of gain to determine the value of tubedegradation. If suddenly the gain provided by the tube increasesdramatically from the previously stored value this indicates that a newtube has been inserted and the process is reset. Thus, by this mechanismit is not necessary to inform the control device 101 that a tubereplacement has taken place.

In, the preferred embodiment shown in FIG. 6, a question is asked atstep 604 as to whether a new tube is present and if answered in theaffirmative, new gain values are stored at step 605. Alternatively ifthe question asked at step 604 is answered in the negative, a questionis asked at step 606 as to whether the gain is very low. If this isquestion is answered in the affirmative, an alert is raised at step 607to the effect that the tube has degraded substantially and that areplacement may be required.

In order to determine the gain of the tube, the tube is driven to two ormore known anode current values which in turn removes effects due tochanging high tension voltages. The degree of bias voltage required inorder to achieve these currents is determined thereby allowingcalculations to be made with respect to the differences. In a typicalexample, a fresh tube may require an output value of one thousand twohundred to give 30 mA of cathode current. However, after a period oftime, due to degradation, it may require an output value of threethousand to obtain the same level of cathode current. It shouldtherefore be appreciated that in a preferred embodiment tube degradationis determined by considering differences over a period of time giventhat the preferred system does not have a mechanism for the directmeasurement of grid voltages.

FIG. 7

Operational activities 506 are detailed in FIG. 7. At step 701 aquestion is asked as to whether an audio signal is present. If an audiosignal is present, it is not possible to perform control procedures,however it is necessary to apply an appropriate grid bias in order toeffect appropriate amplification of the incoming audio signal. Underthese circumstances, it is necessary to rely on pre-stored values sothat these pre-stored values may be deployed until an opportunity isidentified for performing measurements when no audio signal is present.

If the question asked at step 701 is answered in the affirmative, to theeffect that audio is present, a question is asked at 702 as to whetherpreviously written values for bias voltage control are considered to bevalid.

In the preferred embodiment, when no input audio has been detected for asubstantial period of time, such as, for example, two minutes, thecontrol device 101 enters an alternative mode of operation, the fulldetails of which will be depend upon options chosen during thecommissioning stages. Part of these alternative procedures includewriting the present control values for the output grid, that is theoutput values produced by the processing device 201, to non-volatilestorage. Furthermore, given that it is possible for the processor to beinterrupted during this process, a flag or similar is modified at thestart of the write process and then returned to its original conditionat this end of the process. Thus, if interrupted, the reestablishment ofthe value will be incorrect and any subsequent reading operation willidentify the stored values as being invalid.

Thus, at step 702 a question is asked as to whether the values writtento non-volatile storage are considered to be valid and when answered inthe negative alternative pre-stored values are read at steps 704. Thesepre-stored values are hard-coded within the processing device 201 andrepresent values of grid voltage that may be considered safe under alloperating conditions. Thus, in most situations, the safe values of gridvoltage will not result in optimum operation but optimum operation willbe restored after the biasing procedures have been implemented by theprocessing device 201.

If the written values are considered to be valid, resulting in thequestion asked at 702 being answered in the affirmative, the writtenvalues are read at 703. This will produce a better result than readingthe pre-stored values at steps 704 but again the values will be updatedwhen it is possible for the control device to perform the biasingoperations.

In addition to storing values for grid bias voltage, the alternativeprocedures performed after detecting the absence of audio for a longperiod of time, may also include modifying the operation of theamplifier itself such as by forcing the amplifier into a standbycondition for example. Thus, under these conditions, it is not necessaryfor an operative to manually select the standby condition given that thestandby condition will be effected automatically due to the long absenceof an audio signal. Subsequently, upon detection of an audio signal aninterrupt will result in HT power being returned to the amplifier, againavoiding the necessity for the user to re-establish normal power levels.

For guitar amplifiers, more sophisticated operations may be effectedduring the alternative procedures. In some situations, it is known forthe perceived quality of the amplifier to improve after being worked dueto the input of an audio signal. Although such process may result in thetubes being described has “hot”, experiments have shown that thispreferred mode of operation may actually result in the temperature ofthe valves decreasing. Consequently, during the standby mode, it may bepreferable to adjust grid bias voltage so as to reduce the operationaltemperatures of the tubes and thereby maintain their condition in thispreferred “hot” state.

Before entering the alternative procedures and as illustrated in FIG. 7,in response to the question asked at step 701 being answered in thenegative, to the effect that audio is not present, biasing proceduresare performed upon tube 1 at step 705. Similar procedures are performedon tube 2 at step 706 and so on until biasing procedures are performedupon tube N at step 707. In a preferred embodiment, N is equal to 4therefore the biasing procedures will be repeated four times within eachcontrol device 101. Furthermore, in the preferred embodiment, eachbiasing procedure is completely independent thereby allowing multiplecontrol devices to be included within a single amplification system.

FIG. 8

Procedures 705 for the biasing of tube 1 are detailed in FIG. 8. Itshould also be appreciated that the procedures detailed in FIG. 8 aresubstantially similar for process 706 and process 707.

At step 801 cathode current is measured by measuring the voltage dropacross resistor 106 as previously described. The measurement of currentis preferably repeated many times, as detailed in FIG. 9.

At step 802 a question is asked as to whether the measured current islarger than a value stored representing a fault. If answered in theaffirmative, a fault condition is identified and the fault flag is setat step 803. In a preferred embodiment, the procedures shown in FIG. 8are performed in response to an interrupt and the flag set at step 803is then acted upon when returning to a main routine as illustration inof FIG. 5. In response to the fault flag being set at, step 803, nofurther action is performed and a response is made to the fault at step503.

If the question asked at step 802 is answered in the negative, aquestion is asked at step 804 as to whether the measured current issmaller than the pre-stored value representing a standby condition.Thus, if the measured current value is very small it is assumed that theamplifier has been placed in a standby condition and the standby flag isset at step 805. Again, further procedures may be implemented elsewhere,such as entering an alternative mode of operation as previouslydescribed.

If the question asked at step 804 is answered in the negative, to theeffect that the amplifier has not been placed in a standby mode, aquestion is asked at step 806 as to whether biasing operations have beenperformed recently. This assessment is made in response to the value ofa timer, set at step 808. Thus, the procedures shown in FIG. 7 will beperformed many times, given the processing capabilities of theprocessing device 201. However, it is not necessary to continue makingadjustments to the bias voltage therefore for many iterations thebiasing procedures will be bypassed until an appropriate value,determined by the timer, as been reached. Current continues to bemeasured however in order to identify fault conditions in particular andin this embodiment to identify standby conditions.

If the question asked at step 806 is answered in the negative, to theeffect that a biasing process has not been performed recently, biasadjustments are made at step 807 whereafter at step 808 the timer isreset such that biasing adjustments are not made on the next interruptcall.

FIG. 9

Procedures 801 for measuring cathode current are detailed FIG. 9. Atstep 901 the next current value is read by measuring the voltage acrossresistor 106, as previously described. The value read at step 901 issupplied to an accumulator at step 902 and a question is asked at step903 as to whether x values have read. In a preferred embodiment, x isset to 128 therefore 128 values are read before the question asked atstep 903 is answered in the affirmative.

After reading 128 values, the accumulated value is divided by x (i.e. by128 in a preferred embodiment) to give an average value for the cathodecurrent that may be considered very accurate and stable through theaveraging process.

Thus, in the preferred embodiment, the measuring step measures theoutput current many times to produce a plurality of output measurementsand then averages said plurality of output measurements to produce anactual output current value.

FIG. 10

In a preferred embodiment, measuring, comparing and adjusting areperformed repeatedly until the actual current value is considered to beclose enough to the preferred current value. In particular, in thepreferred embodiment, the adjusting step adjusts the grid bias voltageby an amount that is related to the size of the difference between theactual output current value and the preferred output current value.

Procedures 807 for adjusting grid bias are detailed in FIG. 10. At step1001 a question is asked as to whether the current is considered to bevery high and if answered in the affirmative, a large bias increment ismade at step 1002. Thus, if the cathode current is high, the biascurrent is incremented negatively in order to reduce cathode current.

If the question asked at step 1001 is answered in the negative, to theeffect that the current is not very high a question is asked at step1003 as to whether the current is considered to be high. On thisoccasion, when answered in the affirmative, a small bias increment ismade at step 1004. Thus again, the bias level is increased negativelybut on this occasion by a smaller amount.

Similar procedures are performed if the current is considered to be low.In response to questions asked at step 1001 and 1003 being answered inthe negative, a question is asked at step 1005 as to whether the currentis considered to be very low. On this occasion, when answered in theaffirmative, a large bias decrement is made at step 1006. Thus, thenegative grid voltage is reduced by a substantial amount. However, ifthe question asked at step 1005 is answered in the negative a questionis asked at step 1007 as to whether the current is considered to be low.Thus, when answered in the affirmative at step 1007, the current is lowbut not very low. Thus, a small bias decrement is made at step 1008.

In this preferred embodiment, a distinction is made between a very largedifference and a modest difference although in alternative embodimentsfurther divisions may be included. In addition, the actual amounts thatare considered to be very high or very low are subject toimplementation. In a preferred embodiment, the current value isconsidered to be very high if its converted value produces a figure thatis greater than the reference value by 15 increments. Under suchcircumstances, the input for the digital to analog converter forcontrolling grid bias is adjusted by 9 increments so as to increase thenegative grid bias by a relatively large amount.

Consequently, a high current (as distinct from a very high current) isidentified if the measured difference is less than 15 steps. Under thesecircumstances the grid bias is incremented by a single unit. Thus,eventually, the measured current will reach what is considered to be anoptimum value.

In the preferred embodiment, similar figures are adopted for very lowcurrent as distinct from a low current. Thus, if the current isconsidered to be low by 15 increments or more, the bias is reduced by 9increments. Alternatively, if cathode current produces a result which isless than 15 steps away from its optimum value, further adjustments areonly made by 1 increment.

FIG. 11

In a preferred embodiment, control device 101 is implemented as a module1101 that may be attached to a circuit board 1102 of an amplifier. Themodule 1101 has a housing for attachment to a circuit board 1102 andincludes power terminals 1103 for connection to a power supply. At leastone input terminal receives a representation of actual output currentbetween a cathode and a plate of a tube being controlled. In a preferredembodiment, as previously described, four such input terminals areprovided.

At least one output (preferably four) is provided for supplying a gridbias voltage to a tube being controlled. In the example shown in FIG.11, amplifying tubes 1104, 1105, 1106 and 1107 are provided. A detectiondevice 210 detects the absence of an audio signal. The processing device201 compares the representation of actual output current against apreferred output current value and adjusts the grid bias voltage so asto bring the actual output current value towards the preferred outputcurrent when no audio input signal is present.

In a preferred embodiment, the input terminal receives therepresentation of actual output current via a series resistor 106 and abuffering amplifier 301. Preferably, the processing device includesnon-volatile storage for storing preferred cathode currents andcalculated grid bias voltages.

The embodiment of FIG. 11 includes four tubes and the control device1101 is configured to control the performance of each of these tubesindependently.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 11, the module 1101 is designed to beincorporated in the overall design for an audio amplifier. This resultsin the implementation of an audio signal amplifier that has one or moreinput terminals for receiving one or more audio frequency input signalsand one or more output terminals for supplying one or more amplifiedoutput signals via one or more output transformers. In the embodiment ofFIG. 11, the audio amplifier is a high fidelity stereo amplifier inwhich a stereo input signal is received from an audio signal source1108. The audio input signal is amplified to produce output signals thatare supplied to a left loudspeaker 1109 and to a right loudspeaker 1110.

Each of the plurality (preferably four) of the thermionic tubes has acathode, plate and a grid in which the flow of current between thecathode and the plate is controlled by an input voltage applied to thegrid and a bias voltage applied to the grid. The performance controldevice 1101 monitors cathode currents when there is no audio inputsignal present and adjusts the grid bias voltages so as to adjust thecathode current flowing through each, of the thermionic tubes.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 11, four thermionic tubes are present. Afirst tube 1104 and a second tube 1105 amplify a first channel of astereo pair. A third tube 1106 and a fourth tube 1107 amplify a secondchannel of the stereo pair. The performance control device 1101 adjuststhe grid bias voltages so as to minimise harmonic distortion.

FIG. 12

An alternative amplifier design is illustrated in FIG. 12, usedprimarily for the amplification of audio signals produced by electricinstruments, such as electric guitars and electric bass guitars. In theamplifier of FIG. 12, four thermionic tubes 1201, 1202, 1203 and 1204are present. The thermionic tubes are divided into a first set 1201 and1202, and a second set 1203 and 1204 configured to operate in apush-pull (class B or class NB) configuration.

The performance control device may be substantially similar to device1101 and may be incorporated as part of the amplification design.However, in the embodiment of FIG. 12, the performance control devicehas been retro-fitted to an existing amplifier circuit and is enclosedwithin a black acrylic tube 1205 looking substantially similar toexisting tubes within the amplifier. Within acrylic tube 1205, theelectronic devices are mounted on a circuit board 1206 and an LED 1207is provided which is configured to flash when indicating a faultcondition or the requirement to replace a tube.

In this embodiment, an arrangement of pins 1208 is provided extendingfrom the acrylic tube which has an appearance substantially similar tothat of the existing tubes but in a preferred embodiment it is notcompatible with the existing tubes so as to prevent inadvertentinsertion into an incorrect socket.

In a preferred embodiment, wires extend from the housing that areattached to a respective interface device 1209, 1210, 1211 or 1212. Eachinterface device is arranged to be inserted into an existing socketattached to a circuit board 1213. Insertion of the interface device ismade after the respective tube has been removed, whereafter thethermionic tube is then inserted into the interface device.

Wires extending from the control device 1205 include first wires forcurrent measurement, second wires for supplying grid voltages and thirdwires for receiving power from tube heater terminals. Thus, in apreferred embodiment, it is not necessary to provide additional powersupplies for the control device, given that heaters within the tubesrequire a standard voltage source.

As previously stated, in the preferred embodiment, the housing has anappearance that is substantially similar to a thermionic tube.Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment, the housing houses a transformerfor transforming the received tube heater voltage to provide allvoltages required by the control device.

In a preferred embodiment, an input device 1214, implemented as a row ofswitches, extends from the housing 1205 to facilitate the inputting ofcontrol data for different tube types. Thus, in this embodiment, it ispossible for tubes 1201 to 1204 to be replaced by alternative tube typesgiven that appropriate modifications may be entered via the input device1214 so as to achieve optimised operation that may be different from theinitial design.

An audio input signal is received from an electric guitar or similaraudio source via an input socket 1215. Similarly, amplified output issupplied to one or more loudspeakers 1216. In a guitar amplifier of thetype shown in FIG. 12, it is likely that the tubes will be driven hardin order to produce a preferred distorted tone. It is appreciated thatsuch use reduces tube life but it would be undesirable to modify theoperation of the amplifier when actually amplifying an input signal, asthis may change the desired tonal characteristics and would therefore beconsidered unacceptable to most guitar players. In particular, if anymeasures are taken to modify the operation of tubes used in this way, itis likely that the amplifier will be considered similar to a solid stateamplifier. Consequently, in one embodiment of the guitar amplifier, nomeasures are taken to adjust the use of the device when amplifyingexcept for optimising the grid bias voltage. However it is possible tomake modifications to amplifier operation when the amplifier is notactually amplifying an audio signal, so as to prolong tube life.

Although class B operation is considered desirable in terms of beingmore efficient and particularly so when no input signal is beingreceived, it is also appreciated that some guitarist prefer class Aoperation and guitar amplifiers exist which operate in this way. In analternative embodiment, given that the system relies upon identifyingthe presence or absence of an audio is signal, the grid bias voltagesmay be adjusted so as to force the amplifier into class A operation whenan input signal is being received whereafter, upon detecting the absenceof an audio signal, the grid bias is rapidly negatively increased so asto force the amplifier back into the class B mode of operation.

Furthermore, grid bias levels may be adjusted when no audio signal hasbeen identified so as to minimise tube damage, minimise heat dissipationor maintain amplification characteristics.

1-20. (canceled)
 21. A method of controlling the performance of athermionic tube comprising the steps of: measuring a current in saidthermionic tube; comparing the current to a preferred current; andadjusting a parameter in said thermionic to bring the current closer tothe preferred current.
 22. A method according to claim 21, wherein saidthermionic tube has a cathode, a plate and a grid.
 23. A methodaccording to claim 22, wherein said thermionic tube providesamplification of an audio derived signal by applying a grid bias voltageto said grid.
 24. A method according to claim 23, wherein said step ofmeasuring a current comprises measuring an output current between saidcathode and said plate to identify an actual output current value.
 25. Amethod according to claim 24, wherein said step of comparing the currentto a preferred current comprises comparing said actual output currentvalue to a preferred output current value.
 26. A method according toclaim 23, wherein said step of adjusting a parameter comprises adjustingsaid grid bias voltage so as to bring said actual output current valuetowards said preferred output current value.
 27. A method according toclaim 21, wherein said step of measuring a current is only performed inthe absence of an input audio signal.
 28. An apparatus for controllingthe performance of a thermionic tube comprising: a measuring device formeasuring a current in said thermionic tube; a comparison device forcomparing said current to a preferred current; and an adjustment devicefor adjusting a parameter in said thermionic tube to bring said currentcloser to said preferred current.
 29. The apparatus of claim 28, whereinsaid thermionic tube has a cathode, a plate and a grid.
 30. Theapparatus of claim 29, wherein said thermionic tube providesamplification of an audio derived signal by applying a grid bias voltageto said grid.
 31. The apparatus of claim 30, further comprising an inputterminal for providing said measuring device with a representation ofactual output current between a cathode and a plate of said thermionictube.
 32. The apparatus of claim 31, wherein said comparison devicecompares said representation of actual output current against apreferred output current value.
 33. The apparatus of claim 32, whereinsaid comparison device is configured to compare a plurality ofrepresentations of actual output currents.
 34. The apparatus of claim33, further comprising an output terminal for supplying said grid biasvoltage to said thermionic tube.
 35. The apparatus of claim 34, furthercomprising the step of adjusting the grid bias voltage so as to bringthe actual output current towards the preferred output current when noaudio input signal is present
 36. The apparatus of claim 35, furthercomprising non-volatile storage for storing preferred currents.
 37. Anaudio signal amplifier, comprising: an input terminal for receiving anaudio input signal; an output terminal for supplying one an amplifiedoutput signal via an output transformer; a thermionic tube; and aperformance control device that monitors a current in said thermionictube, compares said current to a preferred current, and adjusts aparameter in said thermionic tube to bring said current closer to saidpreferred current.
 38. An audio signal amplifier according to claim 37,wherein: said thermionic tube has a cathode, a plate and a grid, andprovides amplification of an audio derived signal by applying a gridbias voltage to said grid so as to control a flow of current betweensaid cathode and said plate; and in the absence of an audio inputsignal, said performance control device adjusts said grid bias voltageto bring said flow of current closer to said preferred current.
 39. Anaudio signal amplifier according to claim 36, comprising four thermionictubes, in which: a first thermionic tube and a second thermionic tubeamplify a first channel of a stereo pair; a third thermionic tube and afourth thermionic tube amplify a second channel of a stereo pair; andsaid performance control device adjusts said grid bias voltages so as tominimise harmonic distortion.
 40. The audio signal amplifier as claimedin claim 36, wherein: a plurality of thermionic tubes are divided into afirst set of thermionic tubes and a second set of thermionic tubesconfigured to operate in a push-pull configuration; and said performancecontrol device adjusts said grid bias voltage to encourage a degree ofharmonic distortion.